Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Clinton takes Democrats by storm with simple message: Obama is ready – back him



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 August 2008
BILL Clinton turned from villain to hero in the space of 20 minutes at the Democratic national convention in Denver. That was the time it took to deliver a no-holds-barred endorsement of his former rival, Barack Obama.
Putting aside the simmering tensions left from his role as "attack dog" in Hillary Clinton's primary campaign, Mr Clinton told a cheering audience that Mr Obama was "ready to lead America and restore American leadership in the world".

It was an abrupt change of stance for Mr Clinton who, during the primary campaign, hammered Mr Obama as unfit to be president and described the Illinois senator's opposition to the Iraq war as a "fairy tale."

In his speech Mr Clinton was unambiguous in declaring Mr Obama a worthy commander-in-chief, urging the 18 million Democrats who had backed his wife in the primaries to switch allegiance.

"I want all of you who supported her to vote for Barack Obama in November," he said.

The cheers that rang around the convention centre were as much of relief as adoration, with delegates hoping a damaging split had now been healed.

To say it has been papered over with a Band-Aid might be closer to the truth, with the Clinton camp and Obama supporters still angry.

David Gergen, a former Clinton adviser, said: "It was the most effective, most powerful, most important speech since he left the presidency. We can't tell how it is going with voters, but from a Democrat point of view he teed it up for Barack Obama."

Party bosses hope the speech will reduce the 27 per cent of Hillary supporters who tell pollsters they will not vote for Mr Obama in the November election. That could be an election-losing figure, given that the candidate is now neck-and-neck with John McCain in the polls.

For Mr Clinton himself, the speech was an attempt at rehabilitation: the former Golden Boy of the Democratic Party saw his reputation sink into the mud during the primaries and he badly needs to recover prestige to remain a force in politics.

On Wednesday night all seemed forgiven. Delegates greeted his arrival on stage with a three-minute standing ovation leading to several false starts before Mr Clinton finally commanded: "Sit down!"

By turns funny and nostalgic, he told his audience that Mr Obama was as ready for office as he had been 16 years before. "Republicans said I was too young and too inexperienced to be commander-in-chief – sound familiar? It didn't work in 1992, because we were on the right side of history. And it won't work in 2008, because Barack Obama is on the right side of history."

Democrats in the audience, who have watched the party lose two previous presidential elections, hope the party can now concentrate on fighting the Republicans rather than each other. A Chicago party activist, Leah Yarrow, said: "The main goal is to win the election."

Mr Clinton's supporters insist his departure from Denver ahead of Mr Obama's speech last night at a sports stadium was not a snub, more a case of passing the baton on to the next generation. After his performance in those 20 minutes, Democrats may be inclined to believe him.

McCain charm offensive

ALSO evident last night was what appears to be the Democrat's mantra of the coming campaign, an avoidance of personal attacks on John McCain.

"He loves our country every bit as much as we all do," Mr Clinton said of the Vietnam war veteran. But, he said, Mr McCain "still embraces the extreme philosophy which has defined his party for more than 25 years".

Similar language was used by Mr Obama's vice-presidential candidate, Joe Biden, who enthused: "John McCain is a friend of mine, and it really pains me to say this, but he's wrong."

The tactic is recognition by Mr Obama's handlers that, as a genuine war hero, personal attacks on Mr McCain are likely to backfire with the voters.

Tucker Bounds, Mr McCain's spokesman, said Mr Clinton's about turn, from sulking antagonist to full-blooded Obamacan, smacked of desperation by party bosses: "President Clinton was finally forced to testify that Senator Obama is ready to be president, despite his previous arguments to the contrary."


The full article contains 726 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 August 2008 9:42 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jock MacSprog,

29/08/2008 01:06:03
Neither slick Willie or Shrillary sounded very convincing. They were essentially being forced to proclaim their luke warm support for Obama, but its clear that they really dislike they guy. Many Hill Dog supporters will vote for McCain.
2

Whitecaps,

Vancouver, Cda 29/08/2008 02:46:37
#1 Jock

I was able to see a replay of Bill Clinton's speech and he can sound very convincing. His loyal followers are like zombies and appear to believe every word he says. These are the same idiots that before the stained dress came forward swore Bill Clinton “did not have sex with that woman”.

Obama has the same ability to deliver a good speech. The unlike Clinton, Obama can’t do it with out a teleprompter. Clinton was all talk and never walked the walk, will Obama be the same? They say Hitler use to give good speeches; a good speech giver does not always make a good leader.
3

Yane,

29/08/2008 03:36:19
Americans — don't you hate being told what to do by politicians whose heads mightn't be facing the front when they're done spinning around?
4

D-945,

29/08/2008 04:56:48
#2

Clinton and Hilter did have things in common. You are correnct in saying they both gave good speeches and they both had mindless followers.
5

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 29/08/2008 04:57:37
Here is a story saying that Obama is getting a 'bounce' in the polls now.

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/08/28/convention-bounce-in-evidence-for-obama.html

Its normal that the democrat candidate get up to a 10 point bounce just after the democrat convention. and likewise its normal for the republican candidate to do the same after their convention.

Obama's supporters have been worried that McCain has been inching up in the polls and according to some polls even McCain went ahead.

But this is a small bounce for Obama.

I think Yane in 3 asks a good question. I mean Clinton is a sleazy snake-oil salesman. Believe me, americans get tired of it. Thats why about one third won't vote and half the people who do vote dislike both candidates.
6

Wally,

By THe Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 29/08/2008 05:30:52
that little 'bounce' poll I showed in #5 was taken before Obama's speech tonight.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/election08/articles/2008/08/28/20080828convention-rdp0828-ON.html

Everyone is saying it was a great speech. Pat Buchanan, the conservative journalist, said it was magnifacent.

The real bounce will come in next 2-3 days.
7

CombatVet68,

New Babylon 29/08/2008 07:10:21
In my 60 years of life, I have seen and heard the same old rot that the "democraps", including Obama, have been screaming in every election..."change". I have seen the arrogance of the socially elite grow more emboldened, proclaiming that they really care about the common man. What rubbish.

As for Clinton, (Dillary and Willie Boy) his words sound hollow and most assuredly a lie: (I quote)

"Republicans said I was too young and too inexperienced to be commander-in-chief – sound familiar? It didn't work in 1992, because we were on the right side of history. And it won't work in 2008, because Barack Obama is on the right side of history."

He was a major embarrasment and a lousy president. He totally lost the support of our military, ref: the Somalia incident. In my view, he was one of the worst commanders in chief we've had since Jimmy Carter. He has the morals of a high class prostitute. As for the political infighting, well, you must remember that Hillary "Jezebel" Clinton still has approximately 24 Million dollars in debt she needs help paying off. Doubtless, the Democraps have negotiated a deal to wipe all or part of it away in exchange for the Clinton thumbs up speeches for Obama.


8

ghost chaser,

the other side of the pond and burning up !!! 29/08/2008 08:30:01
no's 1,2,3,4, As a country that we are we are fortunate to be able to vote for mindless, incompetent, dress staining politicians, but really to say that Obama is like Clinton is just rude and uneducated at best. there is a saying " walk a mile in my shoes ect " then you can criticize. I love the UK and have the most respect for your country and yes I had a joke or two about your Prince Charles and Carmella"s affair.
On the record I immensely detest Clinton, but feel much more anger towards Prez. Bush. our economy has taken a dive over the last few months and with the cost of fuel and housing prices that fell we know have an economy that is near depression era statice. I hope that a change in leadership will bring us back to the place that, yes I hate to say it, Clinton era financial security. as for me I always make my own choices as for who I am going to vote for. I do not need ANYONE telling me who I NEED to vote for. that is my opinion.
9

Boy Wonder,

29/08/2008 08:40:45
Frankie Boyle made a very shrewd observation on Mock the Week last night, when he noted that Obama and Biden were only a few letters short of a man hiding in a cave in Afghanistan.

Frankie for PM ... of New Atlantis!! Which is what he calls Britain when England slips beneath the waves! :D
10

Yeah1,

29/08/2008 12:03:15
#4

"Clinton and Hitler did have things in common. You are correnct in saying they both gave good speeches and they both had mindless followers."

I suppose Bush only has one thing in common with Hitler then - the mindless followers.
11

Boy Wonder II,

29/08/2008 13:25:07
#4 Yeah1

Sounds like you're a fan of Hiltler.
12

JG,

29/08/2008 13:58:29
#7 CombatVet68
You cannot seriously think that anyone was worse than the present incumbent? It's strange how lots of Amerians think it's henous to to take your top off on the beach or to have an affair (not that I approve of that, mind you) but fine to own more lethal weapons than the local army barracks!
13

Yeah1,

29/08/2008 14:10:12
#11

"Sounds like you're a fan of Hiltler."

Who is Hiltler? Never heard of him or her. If you mean a fan of 'Hitler' I'm not too sure why you would think that?
14

Wally,

By THe Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 29/08/2008 14:10:14
The Clintons told the Democrat National Committee people that they would not give these endorsement speeches for Obama unless the DNC agreed to pay the $24 million debt of the Hilary CLinton campaign.

Hilary's campaign reached a point where her donors were sick of giving and she stopped raising much money. But she increased her spending anyway in a desperate effort to win.
15

Sandi,

San Diego 29/08/2008 15:17:51
Wally, Hillary's donors didn't stop giving-and most of them are not giving to Bambi now. She raised a lot of money, but as Obamawas raising even more, it made her $20m seem small, when really it's not a small amount for a candidate to raise. And even though she raised and spent a lot less, she still got more votes and was only about 56 pledged delegates behind. The whole Democratic primary was a travesty.

I don't for one minute agree that the Clintons were able to make a deal like that with the DNC. For one thing, the DNC has very little money. Obama is raising a lot, but only half what his campaign said they would raise, and the DNC fundraising now goes through his campaign. The fact is that he's not raising enough money to fund both a presidential cmpaign and the DNC, which gives money to down-ticket Democratic candidates. The whole party is being slowly destroyed by Obama, but it's not really Obama it's the man behind him, the money man, George Soros. He has bragged for years that he was going to own the Democratic party, and now he does.

The rumor this morning is that McCain has chosen Sarah Palin for VP. If that is the case, Bambi and Biden are dead in the water.
16

mike - across the pond,

WJC 29/08/2008 15:54:56
"hes ready, back him"...

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"...

nah sorry aint drinkin the kool-aid....
17

mike - across the pond,

JG.... 29/08/2008 16:31:49
worse than W....

WJC wasted "peace dividend"... impeached

carter Iran, Taiwan

LBJ great society

truman pottsdam

hoover depression

wilson isolationist versailles

nixon impeached

ford.... JFK... Harding.... (incomplete term)

need I go on?
18

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 29/08/2008 18:00:34
Wally, the bounce will shortly disappear with announcement of a woman candidate for VP with McCain.
After the GOP convention, we will see the bounce that McCain gets.
19

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 29/08/2008 18:01:46
Wally, I am sorry I lft out the word Qualified woman candidate.!! More so, than Obama.
20

JG,

Fife 29/08/2008 19:05:39
#17 Mike
W ....... probable recession, Afghanistan, Iraq and spoiling for a fight with Iran?
21

Media 1,

cape town 29/08/2008 19:13:17
Strange!
But was it not a mere 5 weeks ago that the Clinton's were slating Obama? Hypocrites.
Why should anyone be interested in listening to a former president who almost got expelled from the white house for sticking his c#kc in an interns mouth and a woman who has so little pride in herself that she still stands by him?
These people are lying, cheating scum! So much so that not only do they cheat on each other, but also themselves, one can only imagine how they would cheat people they dont know.
22

57Nomad,

29/08/2008 19:22:18
#3 Yane

yane said:

"Americans — don't you hate being told what to do by politicians whose heads mightn't be facing the front when they're done spinning around?"

Wow! You must have never been to the US or you wouldn't think that you have scored with a stinging witticism. Here's the news, Yane. Americans hate being told what to do by ANYBODY, head spinning politicians making up a microscopic percentage of people whom we hate being told what to do by.

Where you err is in thinking that our politicians or anyone else is in our face telling us what to do. You are aware of the American government primarily on the national level. Theres no reason why you should know any more.

But unlike European countries, in the US power and responsibility are radically decentralized. The vast majority of legislation that affects our everyday lives is at the local level. There are city governments, county governments, and state governments. This is where the bulk of governance takes place.

As far as head spinning politicians, please, you make us blush. A European mentioning the US is the same league as "Europe! Worlds Leading Producer of Head-Spinning Politicians." How are things in Belarus? Still got that Stalin thing going on? How's things in the Balkans? Isn't there some Nazi guy making big headway in Austria? We're all for letting bygones be bygones so why dig up that nasty Hitler, Stalin, et al, and the Fleurs Du Mal of European Socialism, Fascism and Communism.

Besides we'd rather have head-spinners than guys like Chirac, who told candidate EUers, some of whom had the temerity to defend their own interests, that they had " passed up an excellent chance to keep their mouths shut"

One more thing, if we feel that the head spinning is beginning to interfere with the politician's job performance we can vote his ass out in a heartbeat. You don't even get a chance to vote for the EU legislators do you? Aren't they appointed? I don't know and this isn't a
23

57Nomad,

29/08/2008 19:23:37
#22 contd.

You don't even get a chance to vote for the EU legislators do you? Aren't they appointed? I don't know and this isn't a set up. Does the EU have the power to levy taxes? It seems to me that being taxed by individuals you didn't get a chance to vote for would get old in a hurry.

In the American federal government the power to levy taxes and to spend tax money is the sole province of the House of Representatives. These congressmen must stand for election every two years. In this way the people can quickly get rid who are incompetent enough to stand out from the rest of marginal characters that make up the political class everywhere.

But, my dear Yanes, if you think they pushing us around you are mistaken. Ask yourself this question. Would you let yourself be pushed around by a guy with a spinning head? Well, would you? Probably not. We aren't going to either. Pushed around, indeed!

24

57Nomad,

california 29/08/2008 19:43:46
#18 Lynne

According to Rasmussen, Obama got a negative bounce. Or, put another way, McCain got Obama's bounce. The Dems are silently hoping that something hasn't gone disastrously wrong. The Democrat nominee should be 15 points ahead at this point and they know it. Looks bad for them, real bad.
25

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 29/08/2008 21:59:48
Nomad, you don't know how happy that makes me. I think it's a woman's right to choose, and that is the thing that sets me apart from the strict conservative view. I am only hoping Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and the other two octagenerians on the Supreme do not die or retire in the next 4 years!! But this VP pick was the best thing for both parties. Too bad Obama screwed it up, he lost millions of women voters, and the Democratic party will be paying for their treatment of Hillary for years to come.
26

Yane,

30/08/2008 01:50:55
#22 & #23 Geez it's not hard to push your buttons eh 57Nomad?
I'm not in Europe I'm writing from Melb. Aust. & I didn't say that you were pushed around or claim any knowledge of American politics & society. But I was irritated, again, irritated, by Clinton doing an about-face. I thought it was selfish the way all these candidates slagged one another off a short time ago — & now they're all buddies. You tell me — would there be any chance that being backed by Clinton now would actually work against Obama?
27

mike - across the pond,

JG.... 01/09/2008 09:46:36
recession

knowest thou the definition of a "recession"...

3 consecutive months of a reduction in gross domestic product

we havent had two in the last 5 years...

clinton left a recession...

W clawed us out of it...

9/11 hit... and our economy went into the tank....

we've been back for a while now

like Phil Graham said... the only recession going on is in our minds... more specifically in the minds of the democrats....

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.